Darwin’s Children (2003) and Denton’s Children of the Light (2)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: November 26, 2018

Darwin’s Children (2003) and Denton’s Children of the Light (1)
Excerpt: See for instance: “RNA interference” Items: 1 to 20 of 61782 The link from light-activated microRNA biogenesis to RNA interference and ecological adaptations in a new human species was placed into the context of  The Darwin Code .
The hyponastic response is an upward bending of leaves or other plant parts, resulting from growth of the lower side.
Light-tracking in night-blooming Brugmansia helps to put the link from microRNA biogenesis to the hyponastic response into the context of the Efficiency and precision of microRNA biogenesis modes in plants 10/5/18 The preprint was published  8/8/18 in bioRxiv and there were no comments.
Clearly, biologically uninformed theorists were afraid to say anything about how light-tracking can be linked to proof that God creation virucidal sunlight.
For example, light-activated changes in hyponastic leaves 1 (HYL1) and SE to have a major impact on miRNA biogenesis efficiency. The link from microRNA biogenesis to biophysically constrained viral latency has been placed into the context of the creation of ATP, the creation of RNA, and to RNA-mediated DNA repair in supercoiled DNA in species from bacteria to humans.  Natural selection for energy-dependent codon-optimality has been linked to the correct structural determinants of supercoiled DNA and and the transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of amino acid substitutions that differentiate all cell types of all individuals of all living genera.
See: Aminolevulinic acid

δ-Aminolevulinic acid (also dALA, δ-ALA, 5ALA or 5-aminolevulinic acid), an endogenous non-protein amino acid, is the first compound in the porphyrin synthesis pathway, the pathway that leads to heme[1] in mammals and chlorophyll[2] in plants.

5ALA is used in photo-dynamic detection [3][4][5][6] and photo dynamic surgery of cancer.[3][4][5][6]

Facts about the Virus-mediated archaeal hecatomb in the deep seafloor suddenly seem to have caught the eye of proponents of Intelligent Design who ask Why Our Sun and Atmosphere Appear Intelligently Designed  (video)
For comparison to the claims of serious scientists who know that the anti-entropic virucidal energy of sunlight must link microRNA biogenesis to the identity of structural determinants in supercoiled DNA, we have a ridiculous question about the creation of our sun and atmosphere.

 Young Earth Creationists have shown that the creation of the sun links light-activated microRNA biogenesis to biophysically constrained viral latency in all living genera via the physiology of reproduction in the context of a literal interpretation of Biblical Genesis.
Discovery Institute’s Center for Science & Culture is among the losers who have been touting claims about the age of the Earth in the context of evolution. See for comparison: Energy as information and constrained endogenous RNA interference (video)
The “Discovery Institute’s Center for Science & Culture” has been at the cutting edge of touting pseudoscientific nonsense. Now, they have been forced to deal with my model and my 25+ years history of published works and presentations in the context of games for ages 10+ that link God’s Creation of Subatomic particles to Cytosis and the prevention of all disease — and the demise of the pathology-promoting Democrats who profit from unnecessary suffering and death.

See for instance: “RNA interference” Items: 1 to 20 of 61782 The link from light-activated microRNA biogenesis to RNA interference and ecological adaptations in a new human species was placed into the context of  The Darwin Code .

Greg Bear got it right in his representations of pheromone-controlled sympatric speciation. Even though he placed the facts back into the context of evolution, he paved the way for others to follow his lead.

More than 15 years later, Michael Denton’s Children of the Light exemplifies the light energy-dependent biophysical constraints on the creation of Darwin’s Children . Greg Bear  presciently linked light-activated microRNA biogenesis in plants to biophysically constrained viral latency and the creation of a new superior human species via the food energy-dependent physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction in species from microbes to non-human primates.

Embryo survival-A genomic perspective of the other side of fertility was the key to Greg Bear’s insight. The genomic perspective on fertility and the transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of embryo survival were linked to the survival of Darwin’s Children in the now well-established context of links from light-activated microRNA biogenesis in plants to sperm microRNAs in mammals.

See: The Bull Sperm MicroRNAome and the Effect of Fescue Toxicosis

See also:Time-resolved RNA profiling for cancer research and beyond

While conventional RNA sequencing allows comprehensive transcriptome analyses at steady state, its utility for probing transcriptional responses to cell perturbations is limited by the vast diversity of messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein half-lives. At early time points, detectable changes in mRNA abundance are inevitably biased toward short-lived transcripts…

A theory of adaptation that requires changes to be undirected, copious, and small in extent has no room for explanations of such rapid responses to environmental challenges.

For example: Evolutionary resurrection of flagellar motility via rewiring of the nitrogen regulation system

Our results demonstrate that natural selection can rapidly rewire regulatory networks in very few, repeatable mutational steps.

They claim that base pair changes linked to amino acid substitutions like p.R442C (Substitution – Missense, position 442, R➞C) and
c.1324C>T (Substitution, position 1324, C➞T) are mutations and they link them to the weekend resurrection of the bacterial flagellum.

For comparison, the CMI Acts & Facts series touts “Continuous Environmental Tracking” in an attempt to fool people who have not learned how to link God’s Creation of subatomic particles from cytosis and the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction to biophysically constrained viral latency via what they eat.

Proponents of Intelligent Design place the nonsense about “continuous environmental tracking” into the context of evolved perfection.

See what young earth creationists in the United States have done to promote neo-Darwinian theories by ignoring this published work from 2012: Evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) structure and its receptor (Journal of Animal and Feed Science)

Simply put: You are what you eat.

It is evident now that the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) structure was already in existence very early in the evolution of animals and was co-opted in diverse ways to regulate reproduction. During 600 million years of animal evolution, the N and C termini of GnRH have been conserved as functional domains for binding and activating cognate receptors to accomplish its functions. About 400 millions years ago, a single substitution of the chiral amino acid in position 6 of GnRH in jawless fish by the achiral glycine facilitated a type II’ β-turn conformation of GnRH to allow spatially close interaction of functional domains of GnRH with receptors, in contrast to the interaction of more extended GnRH structures with their cognate receptors in earlier-evolved species. GnRH II was preconfigured to this conformation through intramolecular interactions, which accounts for its high binding affinity and total conservation of primary structure over 400 million years of evolution. It is very surprising and fascinating that the coordinated evolutionary selection of amino acids participating in binding GnRH has resulted in such perfection, that no substitution with a natural amino acid in any position improves binding potency.

The Russians could have influenced the mid-term elections in the USA by releasing more information about Pheromonal Regulation of Genetic Processes: Research on the House Mouse (Mus musculus L.) They could place the facts from 1994 into the context of this report on nuclear waste: Russian Scientists Discover Bacteria That Neutralizes Nuclear Waste

…nuclear waste which can otherwise decay over a period of millions or even billions of years.

See for comparison: A new twist on uranium’s origin story, by CSU scientists

The uranium in these deposits, which are called roll fronts, has long been thought to form over millions of years via chemical reactions of sulfur and other non-biological compounds.

This widely accepted textbook geology is being challenged by Colorado State University biogeochemists in a new study published June 1 in Nature Communications.

Simply put, bacteria that eat electrons create uranium ore and the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction biophysically constrains all pathology.

Remember when Ken Wolgemuth wrote:

The role of bacteria in forming this ore deposit is not creating new uranium, that happens with nucleosynthesis in supernovae explosions. The bacteria affect the chemistry of uranium atoms to form a concentration of uranium ore.

The physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction in bacteria biophysically constrains the sun’s anti-entropic vircudal energy, which is the source of all energy on Earth, by neutralizing the waste products produced by bacteria that eat electrons.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: