Biologos bastardized it all, again

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: October 8, 2018

(click to enlarge)

Summary: Feynman placed the creation of uranium isotopes by electron-eating bacteria into the context of an example of human idiocy. I would love to see experimental evidence of top-down causation that refutes his claim about the obvious link from theoretical physics to biophysically constrained viral latency and all biodiversity on Earth, by starting from the creation of uranium isotopes.

How Old are the Hawaiian Islands? (video)

In less than 6 minutes, you can see that Biologos is hard-pressed to continue to ignore the experimental evidence of top-down energy-dependent causation, which links the photic zone to biophysically constrained viral latency and healthy longevity via the creation of uranium isotopes.
The isotopes are sometimes used to kill some cancer cells, which eventually allows other cancer cells to kill the patient via the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA and failed DNA repair. See: A new twist on uranium’s origin story, by CSU scientists

The uranium in these deposits, which are called roll fronts, has long been thought to form over millions of years via chemical reactions of sulfur and other non-biological compounds.
This widely accepted textbook geology is being challenged by Colorado State University biogeochemists in a new study published June 1 [2017] in Nature Communications.

The challenge to widely accepted textbook geology cannot be ignored by Francis Collins as NIH director or in the context of false claims made at Biologos. The challenge is met by withholding experimental evidence of how light-activated microRNA biogenesis has been linked by scientific creationists in South Korea to all biodiversity on Earth. That is the only way that Biologos can continue to thwart the efforts of serious scientists and support more NIH funded research with the help of director Francis Collins, who continues to bastardize everything known about how the physiology of reproduction protects all organized genomes from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA, which links mutations to all pathology.
In less than 7 minutes, you can see my response to the pseudoscientific nonsense touted by neo-Darwinian theorists who fail to start with the creation of the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy and link it from the creation of uranium isotopes to biophysically constrained viral latency via microRNA biogenesis.

See also: A Quick HYL1-Dependent Reactivation of MicroRNA Production Is Required for a Proper Developmental Response after Extended Periods of Light Deprivation

…plants alter microRNA (miRNA) biogenesis in response to light transition.

See also: Francis Collins refutes theistic evolution (2/15/17)
For a historical perspective, see the question by: Daniel Cross

Are you claiming there is “creation of uranium isotopes” when the researchers themselves make no such claim?

My response:

Of course I am making that claim.

Daniel Cross may be the co-author of: High fluence laser damage precursors and their mitigation in fused silica (2014)

A better understanding of the complex chemistry and physics of cleaning, rinsing, and drying will likely lead to even further improvements in the damage performance of silica and potentially other optical materials.

The 2014 publication suggests the authors know nothing about biophysically constrained light-activated biogenesis in optical materials such as all cell types in all individuals of all living genera. No one expects them to know anything about the creation of all light-activated life on Earth.
But see:

Feynman placed the creation of uranium isotopes by electron-eating bacteria into the context of an example of human idiocy. I would love to see experimental evidence of top-down causation that refutes his claim about the obvious link from theoretical physics to God’s Creation of biophysically constrained viral latency and all biodiversity on Earth, by starting from His Creation of uranium isotopes.

Daniel Cross:

This clips is hilarious, and never once mentions the words uranium, isotopes, or bacteria.

James Kohl

Are you claiming that Feynman did not know how to link what organisms eat to the creation of uranium isotopes by the physiology of reproduction in bacteria because he failed to include everything he knew in the video?

Are you going to accept or deny responsibility for some of the nonsense from “High fluence laser damage precursors and their mitigation in fused silica”

Feynman also claimed:

I really can’t do a good job, any job, of explaining magnetic force in terms of something else you’re more familiar with, because I don’t understand it in terms of anything else you’re more familiar with.

I can’t explain what I know to people like Daniel Cross because they do not understand anything about the levels of biological organization that I have detailed in my published works and presentations during the past two decades.

If you are not a biologically uninformed theorist, see: Nutrient-dependent Pheromone-Controlled Ecological Adaptations: From Angstroms to Ecosystems

See this explanation of biophysically constrained viral latency and all biodiversity, which was placed into the context of what I understand. Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception
Stop claiming that any aspect of light-activated microRNA biogenesis and cell type differentiation linked to healthy longevity is not understood by all serious scientists. Do not expect a serious scientist to explain anything to a biologically uninformed theorist outside the context of this game for ages 10+. Cytosis: A Cell Biology Board Game

Biologos bastardized it all, again

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts:

Subscribe

Important Pages

Connect