A mental health problem at the highest level (2)
Biologically uninformed theorists and so-called science journalists have ignored their own mental health issues and focussed their attention on the mental health of serious scientists. Some of the serious scientists advise the President of the United States in attempts to help him make America great again by draining the political and academic swamps.
It is time to examine the personality disorders of theorists and biologically uninformed journalists for comparison to the mental health of serious scientists and the President of the United States of America.
The theoretical underpinnings of interpersonal style fall into an approach popular in the mid-20th century postulating that “all interpersonal interactions reflects attempts to establish and maintain self-esteem or avoid anxiety” (p. 679). According to this view, you’re constantly trying to feel good about yourself in your relationships because to recognize weakness would make you feel anxious. At some level, the theory proposes, we’re always searching for approval and validation.
The theoretical underpinnings led pseudoscientists to claim:
The 8 traits identified [are] …. domineering, vindictive, cold, socially avoidant, nonassertive, exploitable, overly nurturant, and intrusive.
- – Histone and DNA modifications
- – Histone modifier enzymes
- – Histone modification binding proteins
All epigenetic modifications are energy-dependent and biophysically constrained by the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction in species from microbes to humans. That fact has been known to all serious scientists since we included it in the context of our molecular epigenetics section from this 1996 Hormones and Behavior review: From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior
See for comparison: The Future of Secularism: a Biologically Informed Theory Supplemented with Cross-Cultural Evidence
See the discussion attempt on the: Neuroscience Facebook group
Watch as participants from this group assert the claim that their theory about the intelligence and fertility of Muslims compared to Jews and Buddhists is “biologically informed.”
See for comparison: SIRT6-dependent cysteine monoubiquitination in the PRE-SET domain of Suv39h1 regulates the NF-κB pathway
Reported as: Researchers identify a new chromatin regulatory mechanism linked to SirT6
…suggests a regulatory landscape of these modifications much more complex than previously anticipated…
This suggests they failed to anticipate the link from the creation of anti-entropic virucidal energy of the sun by the entity that John Hewitt referred to as “Sky Daddy.” For comparison to his ignorant biologically uninformed approach to chromatin regulatory mechanisms, see:
Analysis of experience-regulated transcriptome and imprintome during critical periods of mouse visual system development reveals spatiotemporal dynamics (with my emphasis)
Visual system development is light-experience dependent, which strongly implicates epigenetic mechanisms in light-regulated maturation. Among many epigenetic processes, genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism through which monoallelic gene expression occurs in a parent-of-origin-specific manner. It is unknown if genomic imprinting contributes to visual system development. We profiled the transcriptome and imprintome during critical periods of mouse visual system development under normal- and dark-rearing conditions using B6/CAST F1 hybrid mice. We identified experience-regulated, isoform-specific, and brain region-specific imprinted genes. We also found imprinted microRNAs were predominantly clustered into the Dlk1-Dio3 imprinted locus with light experience affecting some imprinted miRNA expression. Our findings provide the first comprehensive analysis of light-experience regulation of the transcriptome and imprintome during critical periods of visual system development. Our results may contribute to therapeutic strategies for visual impairments and circadian rhythm disorders resulting from a dysfunctional imprintome.
A broad-based approach to the failure of most science journalists to understand why energy must be linked to the creation of all biodiversity via the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction in all living genera can be viewed in the light of this 2017 published work: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception
Wen Zhou’s group linked the energy-dependent creation of the sense of smell in bacteria from the physiology of reproduction to our visual perception of energy and mass in the context of the biophysically constrained space-time continuum.
See for comparison: The vibrational theory of olfaction for the win
I hope that other serious scientists will forgive me for suggesting that John Hewitt could help others understand how the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy is used to link the side chains of the tripeptide Ser65-Tyr66-Gly67 to an intrinsic covalently-bonded chromophore.
Like most science journalists, John Hewitt failed to link the creation of energy as information from the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal effects on biophysically constrained viral latency to the creation of enzymes that metabolize food energy and to all pheromone-controlled biodiversity. Most science journalists seem to be united against those who are Combating Evolution to Fight Disease
For example, Ed Yong blocked me from following his tweets, Carl Zimmer blocked me from commenting elsewhere, and I now anticipate only more sarcasm from John Hewitt. Perhaps I should have been less critical of Philip Ball at the end of this interview.
But, J.A. Parker laughed in the same context of this parody, which is a more technical representation of what all serious scientists know about energy-dependent cell type differentiation in the context of biophysically constrained mental and physical health.
All About that Base (Meghan Trainor Parody) 12/10/14
See: A mental health problem at the highest level (3)